Mondulkiri's data should not be written only by the people who publish it. This page lists the indigenous and civil-society organisations already doing that work, and gives anyone — resident, researcher, official — a route to correct, challenge or add to what is recorded on this site.
Reported Organisation details are self-reported by each body or taken from its own published materials. Founding years, funding figures and staffing are not independently audited.
Active associations working with Mondulkiri's indigenous communities. Listed with what they do and who founded them, because the distinction between indigenous-led and externally-established matters when deciding who to approach.
A grassroots association created by Bunong people in response to the loss of land and forest threatening community livelihoods. Works on enforced loss of land and natural resources and its downstream effects on livelihoods, food security and culture.
bunong.org ↗A local member-based federated association of community organisations representing ethnic minority people across Mondulkiri. Developed by Nomad RSI and working predominantly with the Bunong, the province's largest indigenous group.
Mondulkiri Centre / MIPAD ↗Co-manages Keo Seima Wildlife Sanctuary with the Ministry of Environment and runs the REDD+ carbon programme covering ~167,000 ha of dense forest plus a 297,000 ha buffer. Around 20 villages hold recognised traditional forest-use rights inside it.
cambodia.wcs.org ↗Delivered the technical work behind the Provincial Spatial Plan 2021–2040 and the 2016 ecosystem services valuation that priced the province's forest. Active across the Eastern Plains landscape including Phnom Prich.
cambodia.panda.org ↗◆ Open buffer — additional organisations
Reserved for community organisations, CPA committees, commune councils, cooperatives, faith groups and NGOs not yet listed. Include founding year, whether the body is indigenous-led, and a verifiable contact or web reference.
Found something wrong? Know a figure we don't? Have a photograph, a scanned decree or a commune table? Submit it here. Every accepted correction is published to the ledger below with its source, so the record shows who fixed what.
Verified Each ledger entry names the instrument or source it rests on; sub-decree and prakas numbers are as published in the Royal Gazette.
Sample dataThe rows below are illustrative examples of the intended format, not real citizen submissions. They show how accepted, rejected and pending corrections will be published once the module goes live.
Demonstrates how a live entry lands in the feed.
Bou Sra Waterfall distance corrected from “roughly 20 km” to 43 km / ~45 minutes, per the Provincial Spatial Plan. Submitted with a page citation; applied to the Visitor Guide.
Resident reports the Dak Dam community ecotourism circuit now charges a fixed guide fee, differing from the range published here. Awaiting a second source before the figure is changed.
Request to publish disaggregated population for all 92 villages. Logged against active data gap #1 — NIS microdata does not currently release this openly.
Submission claimed a revised provincial population of 120,000. No supporting source provided, and it conflicts with both the 2019 census (92,213) and the provincial 2023 estimate. Contradiction already disclosed in the Legal Register.
◆ Open buffer — ledger & correspondence
Reserved for the real submission log, correspondence with provincial departments, and any correction history you want preserved on the public record.